Parthenium Control - Success Stories
(Source : M. Mahadevappa , Year 1999 . Parthenium And Its Management . Pbl. - Publication Centre University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad - 580 005  INDIA)


Efforts to control parthenium growth in and around  Bangalore city started by programme for parthenium elimination  (PROPEL) in 1986-88. Initially, a few kilograms of Cassia sericea  (CS) seeds were procured from Dharwad and sown in vacant   sites and waste lands in some parts of Bangalore city,  through   voluntary organisations and individuals. In the subsequent years,  the quantity of C. sericea seed obtained increased to quintals  and sowing was done in larger areas excluding vacant sites. Because, the sites were either used for construction or dumped  with debris, thereby coming in the way of establishment of C.   sericea.  From the year 1988-89, release of a beetle, Zygogramma   bicolorata was integrated with the sowing of C. sericea. In some  places like Hebbal railway station, Arnruthahalli cross road (Bellary  road), Jakkasandra and Sarakki layout, the method has proved  successful. In some areas like Indira Nagar, the results have been  discouraging.  In highways like Bellary road, Tumkur road, Bannerghatta road, the method proved to be partially successful. For the first time, an intensive sowing of C. sericea was taken upduring 1990, from May to July on most of the highways.

A survey conducted in the mid-August during 1990 and 1991 on the   establishment of C. sericea, beetle activity and the stand of parthenium could reveal the following:

  1. Cassia sericea has established well by 1991  in 90% of the   places, where it had shown partial establishment in the previous  year, viz.,   Hebbal railway station, Arnrutahalli cross road and  parts of Bellary Road. The growth of C. sericea during 1990 was not as vigorous as in the previous years because of a prolonged drought.

  2. From among the areas sown during 1990, very early sown  (May) places have shown good establishment of CS although  the growth in terms of plant height is not normal in some places. In places where intermittent rains were received, establishment and growth of CS were very satisfactory, both during 1990  and 1991. This plant species could spread on its own and extended its area in 1:5 proportion.

  3. In places where the soil was very porous and rains were scanty,   both germination and establishment were far from satisfactory  during 1990. But, in patches where there were ravines, open drains and depressions, the establishment was better and these plants multiplied in 1:10 proportion by 1991.

  4. Sowing was also done in some places where the soil is very compact and trampled daily by passers-by. Although the C. sericea germinated in these places, establishment was poor  for the want of proper soil conditions, even parthenium did not establish itself normally in such situations. Hence it was felt unnecessary to takeup any operation in future.

The above areas were observed closely to find out the reasons for good, moderate and poor germination and  establishment of C. sericea in different locations.

  • Successful  establishment of  C.  sericea  in   some  places mentioned above may be attributed to early sowings, followed   by enough rains for good germination, growth and root  formation before the commencement of long drought spell. To some extent, the moisture retention capacity of the soil and  low land situations have also contributed to its successful growth.

  • Non-establishment of C. sericea in some places may be attributed to late sowings (July), which might have led to a  situation wherein seeds germinated up to two leaf stage (with one or two rains) followed by long drought spell (4 to 5 weeks) leading to death of seedlings. Probably leaving  no seeds behind for germination after the revival of rains following the drought spell.

  • Partial establishment of C. sericea in some places is either due to some intermittent rains during the drought spell or due  to high moisture content in soil itself due to high water holding capacity or seepage from the neighbourhood drains, ponds etc.

  • In places, where sowing was not followed by early rains, the   entire process of germination and growth of C. sericea had  commenced only after the revival of rains in the month of  August (second rains) and germination and growth was very  satisfactory. The CS plants growing from second rains, however, could not put up normal growth and produce as many seeds as growing from the beginning of the season (June- July). Still, there was enough pods (fruit formation) to multiply   the plant population in a small proportion for the next year.

In places, where the beetle, Z. bicolorata have been  released, defoliation has taken place and the results are clearly  visible even to a layman.   The insects however did not move to  western side from places where they were released, but they moved to some extent to the eastern side. None to 50 numbers of beetles were counted per plant, wherever beetle activity was  observed. Considerable reduction in parthenium seed formation could be seen because of the beetle activity. But this was limited  only to the rainy season i.e., from July to November. Parthenium   started reappearing again wherever it was controlled by insects but not so wherever it was controlled by C. sericea and other botanical agents.

An analysis of the situation
The long drought spell during 1990 was a big handicap for the establishment of Cassia sericea and also for the multiplication  of the beetle. Despite this unusually prolonged drought, successful establishment of C. sericea and spread of beetle in some places indicated the potentiality of the method in controlling parthenium growth. The prolonged drought intervals are not very common though intervals are not uncommon. The effect of partial and sparse establishment of C. sericea in some places may lead to some disappointment for not showing the expected results. Because C. sericea leachate, that was expected to accumulate  in soil to suppress germination and growth of parthenium was inadequate.  Wherever the C. sericea had germinated, but remained without further growth due to stunting in the initial stage could not contribute enough leachate to suppress parthenium.

Follow up action
In some areas, where the seedlings dry up due to drought,  the entire process of sowing has to be repeated next year. In areas, where C. sericea has established partially, supplementary sowings in the coming year will help quick establishment of C. sericea. In areas where C. sericea has established with normal  growth, there is no need for fresh sowings. Some corrections needed in the next sowing:

Highly compact and overtrampled soils like play ground, should not be selected for sowing C. sericea because neither  parthenium nor C. sericea can grow there. The areas likely to be disturbed for construction, roads etc., may also be avoided.

Spacing between rows which is 3" - 8" should be reduced to 2" while sowing Cassia sericea.

Thick sowing should be avoided.  Only 'I,th of the present quantity of seeds per unit area should be sown i.e., 6-8 kg  seeds are enough for planting one acre. This wilt help to cover  more area with the same quantity of seed, besides avoiding inter-plant competition and- aiding better growth of the young   plants.

As far as possible, early sowings and even dry sowings may  be taken up (April to June) so that C. sericea plants could  grow strong enough to withstand any drought intervals.

For better results, the parthenium plants are to be uprooted  before sowing Cassia sericea.

Conclusion
The integrated approach being adopted at present has high potential to control parthenium in the targeted area, as evidenced by success seen to the extent of 60 to 80 per cent in various districts especially in northern Karnataka and southern Maharashtra.

Return to Main Page